The Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, has stated that it is premature to claim that protestors were shot with live bullets during the incident at the Lekki tollgate on October 20, 2020.
In a report released on November 15, the Lagos state commission of inquiry into police brutality and EndSARS referred to the October 20, 2020 shooting at the Lekki tollgate as a slaughter.
The Nigerian Army and Police were also accused in the report of carrying out a “massacre” on unarmed demonstrators who congregated at the tollgate to protest police brutality. The Lagos state administration disputed the panel’s findings in a white paper released on Tuesday, November 30.
Malami stated in an interview with Channels TV that the report is not “conclusive” of the exact situation on October 20, 2020, and that it would be premature to assume that demonstrators were shot with live bullets.
“You (referring to the presenter) are jumping into a conclusion that live ammunition was indeed used during the #EndSARS. Whether the report said so or it does not say so, as far as I’m concerned, I’m not in the position to ascertain because whatever it is, one, you said there was a report.
And arriving from your submission, there was a white paper; arriving from the white paper, part of the report was rejected and part of it was admitted
Within the context of the white paper too, you have criminal investigations that must naturally follow through the process of prosecution when the need arises.
With or without the report, what I’m trying to say in essence, the report, in its own right, cannot be conclusive in establishing a position.
There are still additional layers of administrative and judicial processes that would follow before you can jump into a particular conclusion establishing a point criminal or otherwise.
I think as far as the report, in its own right, it is not conclusive of a provision of what truly transpired against the background of your submission that part of the report was indeed rejected by Lagos state government.
And certainly, there are other investigative components that may at the end of the day translate to criminal prosecution and as such, it is indeed very premature for you to jump into conclusion that live ammunition was used.
I’m not in the position to accept that from you and I can’t share in your conclusion as to whether indeed live ammunition was used. It is premature for me as a chief law officer to share in your conclusion in that direction.”